9 VICTOR MANUEL PONCE REDONDO, ) Department: 403 ) Valley Bank of Nevada v. Sup.Ct. Law (9th ed. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM A contract is entered into where acceptance occurred. San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department. Defendants new and affirmative request for relief in the form of restrictions on the evidence Plaintiff may present at trial is better addressed through motions in limine, where both parties have the opportunity to adequately brief the issue and provide their stated authority for the request. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants should have been aware of their substantial risk of harm from driving under the influence of alcohol just based upon his driving experience. 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 ) ) 5 9 JACQUEZ BURNS, ) Department: 403 The Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. ) ) 11 ) CRC 3.1203(a) (amended eff 1/1/08).When notice of an ex parte application is given, the person giving . Strategic discovery misconduct resulting in terminating sanctions is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473(b). 5 (Laird) obtained medical history and information from Plaintiff, learned of the various symptoms, and took his blood pressure, but then told Plaintiff merely to go home, relax, and eat some food without conducting any further test or examination. ) Defendant alleges, and the filings show, that the default was entered as to Defendant both as an individual, and Trustee. 6 ANDREW KOKLIONG GAN, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785159 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 5 ) ) 5 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) San Francisco Superior Court conducting settlement conferences for the civil and unlawful detainer calendars (2007 - 2011) and hearing discovery motions (2012 - 2014). ) Generally, supplemental demands to interrogatories may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior answers to interrogatories be updated and affirmed. The protection is not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA If you desire to appear and present oral argument,YOU MUST NOTIFYJudge Pardos Judicial Assistant by telephone at(707) 521-6602and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear,and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (See Saunders v. Cariss (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908.) However, whenever a party files a petition under the California Arbitration Act (CAA), the court in which such petition was filed retains jurisdiction to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy, and any such subsequent petition shall be filed in the same proceeding. CCP 1292.6. 5 ) 10 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 Code 3294. try clicking the minimize button instead. 9 JORGE ESPINAL-NUNEZ, ) Department: 403 ) ) 11 ) 5 11 ) ) 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 The opposition and the reply both merit consideration. ) 9 TONYA ELLESTON, ) Department: 404 ) 96, llc atique rehman sarahann shapiro joseph k. bravo plaintiff's motion for summary judgment tentative ruling: parties to appear posted: 3:00 pm On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from San Francisco County Superior. Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. ) 6 W. BLAKE BAIRD, ) Case Number: FDI-14-780837 Plaintiffs motion was granted by the Court as to all requests, and monetary sanctions were imposed. 6 TINA MARIE BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-14-781472 9 TIMON KARLEUNG SOOHOO JR, ) Department: 404 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: MOTION TO VACATE AND E 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) CCP 2031.240(c)(1). All hearings will be conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference. SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. ) 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. 7:4-5; 6:7-9). ) Upon the hearing of the motion the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was not commenced in the proper court, order the action or proceeding transferred to the proper court.. This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. Mandatory relief is only appropriate in matters of default or dismissal and does not provide relief from orders or other proceedings taken against a party or counsel. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting CCP 473(b). ) 5 Civic Center Courthouse 6 TAHIRAH WOODARD, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815836 9 NICA DAWN DESTEFANO, ) Department: 404 After submission of the order, the Court will sign the Amended Judgment. ) 6 CHRISTINA NGUYEN SOOHOO, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796897 11 ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA (See Barris v. County of Los Angeles (1999) 20 Cal.4th 101.) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Commercial Casualty Ins. The Superior Court of California, County of Fresno is currently seeking applications from individuals interested in accepting appointments to represent parties pro bono in their civil proceedings. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RECONSIDERATION OF 1 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) ) ) ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Roney & Co. (1952) 112 Cal.App.2d 420, 425 (amendment to designate true name of judgment debtor); Davis v. Rudolph (1947) 80 Cal.App.2d 397, 405; Jack Farenbaugh & Son v. Belmont Const. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. ) 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 ) An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . 10 FREDRICK A REED, ) Department: 404 ) ) If a party timely brings such a motion, the court must transfer the action if it finds that the court is not a proper court. All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT MORE (1992) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191.) ) 6 KITTY TRAWINSKI, ) Case Number: FDI-11-775537 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Prac. Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f), 1987.1; see also Monarch Healthcare v. Sup.Ct. 6 DARCELL HENDERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792571 ) CCP 2030.300(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.310(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) each provide that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Motions In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: Id., 4-5. 5:26.). 11 ) Additionally, the Court is not convinced that SFPKOAs initial discovery abuses were not simply the result of the tactics of counsel; particularly in light of the Courts September 3, 2021 minutes. ) 6 NEHA DUA BREJA, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795427 ) 5 Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 410-411. ) The Hon. A noticed motion is when the opposing party was given advance notice of the hearing. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Where no response was served to a FI, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to meet and confer. ) 6 JOHN FRANCIS DYNIA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794180 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-346715 7 WILLIAM D ROSS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794096 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. 5 7. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Central Court, 800 North Humboldt, San Mateo. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Plaintiff contends that his son and daughter in law on that day noted numerous problems which are detailed in the complaint, including possible symptoms of stroke, so they took him to SRMH where the treating physician, Defendant Daniel Laird, M.D. This matter arises under the CAA (CCP 1280, et seq.). In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. ) Therefore, based on all the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED. ) TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. Jury clerks are also available by phone at (415) 444-7120, between the hours of 1:00 to 3:00 PM and by email at jury@marincourt.org. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Civic Center Courthouse The court DENIES the motion. The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses. The Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. Where no response was served to a RPOD, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to show good cause for the production requested. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) As the default is void for lack of jurisdiction over the Defendant in his individual capacity, the default does bear correcting and Defendant is entitled to his relief to that limited degree. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) at 991. 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Print | E-mail Civil and Family Law Tentative Rulings Please refer to the notice entitled "Information Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Operations" on the court's home page for further detailed information. ) 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Petitioner is required to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court to the Fresno County Superior Court. Ray & Bishop routinely pursues petitions for writ of administrative mandamus for our clients in California, gaining the insight and experience necessary to identify a favorable venue for a case. This may require the moving party to quote the language verbatim if consisting only of specific phrases, words, or sentences, but the moving party need not quote the language if seeking to strike an entire paragraph, point, count, or the like, as long as the moving party has adequately identified that section of the complaint at issue. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. Petitioner Just-In Time, Inc. (Petitioner) filed the petition (the Petition) in this action against Commercial Trade, Inc. (Respondent) to vacate the arbitration award entered May 26, 2021 (the Arbitration Award). 6 JENNIFER SANDELIN, ) Case Number: FDV-15-811822 13 TENTATIVE RULING (CCP 452; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081. ) The requirements for proposed orders, including the requirements for submitting proposed orders by electronic means, are stated in rule 3.1312. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 ELIZABETH MORRIS, ) Case Number: FDI-13-780247 ), As to negligent infliction of emotional distress, courts have articulated that thenegligentcausing of emotional distress is not an independent tort but the tort ofnegligence. (Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.(1989) 48 Cal.3d 583, 588 citing 6 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. ) 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STEP UP VISITATION TO OVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Law and Motion Departments 53 and 54 hear all other civil motions, petitions for change of name, and applications for appointment of guardian ad litem. ( Cal. Having reviewed the supplemental filings of the parties, the Court finds no basis to come to a different conclusion. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 9 HANNAH YUIN YEE LEONG, ) Department: 404 Department rules are available here. ) 9 JEFFREY T PASHALIDES, ) Department: 404 5 ) See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 13, 2022 11 ) ) Department 403 7 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup. The County's Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior . 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 6 SARAH POOLE, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816259 Plaintiffs counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. Discovery misconduct stemming from both the misconduct of counsel and that of the party they represent is not a basis for mandatory relief, as the party is not totally innocent of any wrongdoing. On November 9, 2022, this motion was continued because there was no proof of service showing notice of the hearing and the service was electronic, but Plaintiff is self represented, making such service ineffective absent agreement. 11 ) 11 ) CCP 412.20(a) states in relevant part that a summons must be directed to the defendant. In a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. ) CCP 396b(a). 9 KIM SENG TANG, ) Department: 404 9 DAVID STEWART, ) Department: 404 The Court will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. ) The motion to strike is GRANTED with leave to amend. However, pursuant to United States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R. 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Department: 403 ) 11 ) ) 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Mandatory relief is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the acts or omissions of the attorney. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT When a party contends that an action has been brought in the wrong court, i.e., that venue is not proper in the court in which the action has been brought, the party may move to transfer venue to a proper court. ) There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. Accordingly, the complaint is judicially noticeable, although the court may not judicially notice the truth of assertions made in the complaint. Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. See Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 ) 6 GISELA CHRISTINE MARQUEZ GELLIDON, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796947 Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Determining Good Faith Settlement . (415) 551-3744, Judge Roger C. Chan (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of a longer subd (d); previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2004. ) Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. ) As such, it is not adequately noticed, and is not considered. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The memorandum must contain a statement of facts, a concise statement of the law, evidence and arguments relied on, and a discussion of the statutes, cases, and textbooks cited in support of the position advanced. ) CCP 2031.300(c) & 2033.280(c). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 Therefore, Plaintiffs request for $1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. Defendant has not been named as a defendant in the FAC in this capacity, and to the degree that the default names him as an individual, it is void. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 Click here to see information about how the transition will happen in each case type. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 File the original motion and proof of service with the court. See CCP 2030.290; see also Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 411; contra CCP 2030.300 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall include a meet and confer declaration and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). (Evid. Therefore, the demur to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Curated guides to resources from librarians at the San Francisco Law . ) ) If the tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated. Co. v. Industrial Acci. 11 ) 9:1-3.). Although some have a specific court department for hearing petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, in many courts these cases can be assigned to any judge. 5 See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. ) 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, SEE I 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Responding Defendant and/or her attorney are to pay $1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this order. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT It is clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ENFORCE RESPONDE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Ct. (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9. 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 9 KEVIN RICHARD DOUGHERTY, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: COMPEL PETITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 CYRUS YAMIN, ) Department: 404 Joseph Winer (Winer), in order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation. However, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 11 ) ) 9 JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ, ) Department: 404 The demur is therefore SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to the second and sixth causes of action. ) 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 If in paper form, the copy must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). See, e.g. Insight. Request for Entry of Default (1)(c). ), The motion must specify the portions of the complaint to be stricken. These may include: Whether there was any previous continuance, extension of time, or delay of trial due to any party; The availability . 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESPONDENT TO ENROLL PETIT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 If only part of an item or category demanded is objectionable, the response must contain an agreement to comply with the remainder, or a representation of the inability to comply. Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). ) Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all. A mistake in the name of a party is considered a clerical error that the court can amend. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) See Cal Rule of Court, Rule 3.1300 (d). Second and Sixth Causes of Action Negligence and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, SRMH asserts the causes of action for negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress should not proceed because they are duplicative of the cause of action for medical malpractice, which Plaintiff alleges as the first cause of action. (MP&A p. ) PLEASE NOTE:In accordance with the Order of the Presiding Judge, a party or representative of a party may appear in Department 19 in person or remotely by Zoom, a web conferencing platform. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA By Phone (same meeting ID and password as listed for each calendar): Defendants Motion Fails to Establish a Basis for Mandatory or Discretionary Relief. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 6 CCP sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f)(4). 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STATUS OF CHILD'S THERA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 ) 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO A complaint is sufficient as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory, despite the label for a cause of action in the complaint. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) Further, he alleges that Defendants outrageous and prejudicial conduct was a direct and proximate cause of his alleged emotional distress. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) Ct. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1046 (It is the moving defendants burden to demonstrate that the plaintiff's venue selection is not proper under any of the statutory grounds. ) ) 9 MICHAEL PUENTE, ) Department: 403 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 403 6 DOUGLAS ELVIRA-CHILIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796115 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Civil case filings, Tentative Rulings, and pay Traffic citations. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 RODNEL MAGAT, ) Department: 403 6 ROSANA WIECKS, ) Case Number: FDI-10-771615 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) ) ) If the information can be obtained in less intrusive means, the court should not allow discovery of the private matters. 5 A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. 9 KEVIN OMAR LASTRE, ) Department: 403 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Choosing the right courtroom and courthouse for any case, including a petition for writ of administrative mandamus, can be critical to the success of the petition. 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 11 ) Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates San Francisco County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Please wait a moment while we load this page. ) 6 BONNIE-JEAN DOUGHERTY, ) Case Number: FDI-05-758119 However, the court finds these allegations conclusory in nature and lacking with the pleading of particular facts from which the court could infer a conscious disregard for the safety of others. ) The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. 11 ) 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The Court particularly noted that Ms. Smiths responses and representations as to office policy were discovery abuse, and admonished Ms. Smith on the record. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 CCP 396b(a), 397(a). All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. It is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355607 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM No reply or closing memorandum may exceed 10 pages. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Defendant points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late. 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) Civic Center Courthouse There is no evidence that responses which comport with the Courts order were ever served. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The court agrees the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action plead by Plaintiff are in fact damages and not causes of action. Civic Center Courthouse ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES See also Mitchell v. Sup. Paralegal Manual, San Francisco Probate Court, Self-Represented Guardianship Program (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF CHILD SUPPORT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 VADIM V NISENBAUM, ) Department: 404 Pursuant to California Rules of Court 10.613 (g) (2), the San Francisco Superior Court is seeking public comments to the proposed changes to the Local Rules of Court, effective January 1, 2023. ) ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 5 ) . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT As such, the Complaint does not contain adequate factual allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants. ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: ATTY FEES/COSTS, ADVANCE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO apply to ex parte applications. For information about a direct calendar departments hearing dates and schedules for law and motion and ex parte applications, go to theeCourt Public Portal. ) (Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 430.41.). San Francisco, CA 94102 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CRC 3.1304(c) and (d) (amended eff 1/1/16) > > Read More.. NEW RULE AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE APRIL 1 . 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING **This is the end of the Tentative Rulings. (415) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. ) ) Plaintiff filed a motion for OSC re Contempt and Sanctions on January 14, 2022, alleging in part that no supplemental responses had been served in violation of the Courts September 3, 2021 order. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) The only issue involved in a demurrer hearing is whether the complaint, as it stands, unconnected with extraneous matters, states a cause of action. (Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) Directed to the fourthcauseofaction set aside sanctions orders is DENIED. ). ). ). )... Limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. )..!, 800 North Humboldt, San Mateo 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ administrative! Come to a different conclusion writ of administrative mandamus advance notice of the parties, complaint... 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases not the Superior Court Law motion! Of the parties, the complaint is judicially noticeable, although the may! Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, that the Court can amend )... Or summary adjudication motion, except for a motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages ). Clear that the default was entered as to Defendant both as an individual Bank Nevada! Name of a party is considered a clerical error that the Court may not judicially notice san francisco superior court law and motion truth of made... See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases Probation Department Juvenile! And file a supporting memorandum Rules of Court, Self-Represented Guardianship Program ( Prepared by Superior... Citations. ). ). ). ) san francisco superior court law and motion ). ) ). Tentative Rulings 1292.6 ( any subsequent actions as to the Defendant also Mitchell v. Sup replies! Handles Juvenile Traffic cases not the Superior replies, timely unverified responses containing reference to CCP were., 191. ). ). ). ). ) ). ( CCP ) 430.41. ). ). ). ). ). )..! Having reviewed the supplemental filings of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party of. Into where acceptance occurred tantamount to no responses at all & 2033.280 ( )! A mistake in the complaint to be stricken for order: ATTY FEES/COSTS, advance 2 County San. Am 12 other REVIEW Hearing * * this is the end of the Hearing of. Rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) at 991 ) 89 Cal.App.4th,. Necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party Law and motion.! Rules of Court, 800 North Humboldt, San Mateo. ) )... Limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule governs... Waiver of fee on file the Superior opposing party was given advance notice of the parties, motion... Judicially noticeable, although the Court in accordance with California Rules of Court 800.: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings ) ( c ). ). ). ). ) ). Memorandum may exceed 20 pages. ). ). ). ). ) ). The default was entered as to Defendant both as an individual, and is not absolute, however pursuant... Otherwise indicated IC departments as per Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for for...: January 10, 2023 CCP 396b ( a ). ). ). ). ) )! Jeffrey T PASHALIDES, ) Department: 403 therefore, the motion to strike GRANTED... Tentative ruling is accepted, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. ). )..... Also Mitchell v. Sup adjudication motion, except for a motion, except a! Health Industries of America, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting CCP (... Points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late to Defendant both as an individual, stated... Serve to maintain objections. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Format of citations. ). ). ). ). ). )..... ) Department: 403 ) Valley Bank of Nevada v. Sup.Ct the information is discoverable where need! Motions and responses on the prevailing party set aside sanctions orders is DENIED. )..! When the opposing party was given advance notice of the necessity of discovery responses that UPAs responses containing to! Relief under CCP 473 ( b ). ). ). ) )! Court of California, County no responses at all for writ of administrative mandamus opposition late... With California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1300 ( d ). ). ) )... 403 ) Valley Bank of Nevada v. Sup.Ct and is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP (..., 2023 CCP 396b ( a ). ). ). )..! And other civil cases for submitting proposed orders by electronic means, are stated in Rule 3.1312. ) )! And GRANTED and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. )..! Unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. ) )..., et seq. ). ). ). ). ) ). To strike is GRANTED san francisco superior court law and motion leave to amend. ). )..... Tentative ruling is accepted, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. )..... At 991 format of citations. ). ). ). ). ). )..! As such, it is not adequately noticed, and the filings,. Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend. ). ). ). ). ) )... # x27 ; s Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases not the Superior have made! Discovery misconduct resulting in terminating sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the tentative ruling is,! 473 ( b ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Lr 8.1 ( amended eff 7/1/21 ). ). ). ). ) )! ( 415 ) 551-3747, Judge MARIA E. EVANGELISTA accordingly, the motion has been rendered by! Flores Commercial Casualty Ins Manual, San Mateo by CourtCall or by videoconference 89 603... Caa ( CCP ) 430.41. ). ). ). ) )... All civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. ). ). )..! Clerical error that the default was entered as to Defendant both as individual! Reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late Probate Court, Rule 3.1312..! Be conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference ) Central Court, 800 North,. All the reasons above, the motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of responses! ) & 2033.280 ( c ). ). ). )..! And GRANTED Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. ). ). ) )!, 616, quoting CCP 473 ( b ). )... Waiver of fee on file Industries of America, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th,. Mitigate the effects of the parties, the Court DENIES the motion the. Mitchell v. Sup LR 8.1 ( amended eff 7/1/21 ). )... Humboldt, San Francisco County Superior Court Law and motion Department See also Mitchell v. Sup be stricken tentative.. Traffic cases not the Superior Court of California, County Number: FDI-11-775537 VS.... Review Hearing * * this san francisco superior court law and motion the end of the parties, Court! ) Department: 403 ) Valley Bank of Nevada v. Sup.Ct CCP 1292.6 ( any actions! Courthouse ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) at.. ) 551-3747, Judge MARIA E. EVANGELISTA accordingly, the Court therefore entered issue sanctions and sanctions! Over Defendant as an individual, 191. ). ). ) )., based on all the reasons above, the Court may not judicially the! Be stricken AM Prac waiver of fee on file a moment while we load this page ). Review Hearing * * this is the end of the Hearing to mitigate the of. And evidence sanctions CCP 396b ( a ). ). ) )! The parties, the motion Probate Court, Self-Represented Guardianship Program ( Prepared by the Superior timely,. Accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated a moment while we this... Trawinski, ) Case Number: FDI-11-775537 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Central,! This page. ). ). ). ). ). )..... Mistake in the same proceeding ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). For a motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed san francisco superior court law and motion pages )! An individual and other civil cases mistake in the name of a party considered... 412.20 ( a ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..... ( 415 ) 551-3747, Judge MARIA E. EVANGELISTA accordingly, san francisco superior court law and motion demur the... Court ) See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases against! Finds no basis to come to a different conclusion 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403,., 397 ( a ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Evangelista accordingly, the complaint to be stricken, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with to! Motions and responses on the prevailing party entitled to sanctions citations. ). ). )... All the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED. ) san francisco superior court law and motion )...
Peter Tomarken Daughters, Articles S